SUMMARY SUSPENSION OF MEDICAL PRIVILEGES
Summary Suspension Notice
If you have just received a summary suspension of your hospital privileges, you are in the middle of a medical emergency for your career. Under California law (Business & Professions Code §809.5), hospitals can immediately suspend or restrict a physician’s clinical privileges when they believe there is an “imminent danger” to patient safety. This action often triggers an 805 report to the Medical Board of California and the National Practitioner Data Bank within days, and the clock is ticking fast. You typically have only a very short window (often just days) to demand a hearing and mount a defense before permanent damage is done to your reputation, credentials, and ability to practice.
Contact a Summary Suspension Defense Attorney - (925) 291-5388
Get Immediate Legal Help
Do not try to handle this alone or delay even one day. Hospitals and their medical executive committees have lawyers advising them from the first moment — you need experienced, aggressive representation on your side right now. At the Law Office of Daniel Horowitz, we are one of the leading firms in California defending physicians in summary suspension and peer review matters. With a team that includes a licensed physician-attorney and decades of high-stakes trial and hearing experience, we move immediately to protect your rights, challenge the basis for the suspension, and fight to get your privileges restored as quickly as possible.
Call us at 925-291-5388 for an emergency consultation.
What Is a Summary Suspension of Medical Privileges?
If you have just received a summary suspension of your hospital privileges, you are facing one of the most serious and time-sensitive crises in your medical career. Under California Business & Professions Code § 809.5, a hospital’s peer review body (usually the Medical Executive Committee) can immediately suspend or restrict your clinical privileges when it believes your continued practice may result in an imminent danger to the health or safety of any patient. This action bypasses normal due process protections and takes effect instantly — often without any prior hearing.
Summary of Medical Board Position on Summary Suspensions
The hospital must review the suspension with the Medical Executive Committee no later than 14 days after it is imposed.
If the suspension lasts longer than 14 days, the hospital is required to file an 805 report with the Medical Board of California and the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) within 15 days. Once reported, the suspension becomes visible to every hospital, health plan, and credentialing body you work with — potentially ending your ability to practice at that facility and damaging your reputation statewide.
You have a very narrow window to act. Delaying even a few days can make it significantly harder to get the suspension lifted and can turn a temporary action into a permanent career threat.
Contact a Medical License Defense Attorney - (925) 291-5388
Why You Need Experienced Legal Representation Immediately
At the Law Office of Daniel Horowitz, we are one of California’s leading practices defending physicians in summary suspension and peer review matters. Our team includes a licensed physician-attorney (Mark Ravis, MD/JD) and attorneys with deep experience in high-stakes medical staff hearings, including Brookes Hammock and others who understand both the medical and legal sides of these battles.
We move quickly because we know the process moves quickly against you. From the moment you contact us, we:
- Analyze the charges and the hospital’s stated basis for “imminent danger”.
- Prepare your response and demand for a prompt hearing.
- Challenge any weak, retaliatory, or sham basis for the suspension.
- Negotiate with the hospital when possible — and aggressively litigate when necessary
Doctors in your position cannot afford to navigate this alone or rely on general counsel. Hospitals have their own experienced attorneys and risk managers guiding every step. You need a battle-tested team that knows how to protect your license, your privileges, and your livelihood — right now.
Call us immediately at 925-291-5388 for an emergency consultation. We respond the same day and can often begin working on your defense within hours.
NPDB Implications of a Summary Suspension
A summary suspension of hospital privileges carries serious and long-lasting consequences through the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). Under federal law (42 U.S.C. § 11133), if a summary suspension lasts longer than 30 days, or if it is imposed and later upheld after a hearing, the hospital is required to report the action to the NPDB. Even a suspension that is resolved within 30 days can still trigger an 805 report to the Medical Board of California, which often leads to parallel investigations and potential NPDB reporting. Once reported, the entry becomes a permanent, publicly accessible flag visible to every hospital, health plan, insurance panel, and credentialing body nationwide for the rest of your career. This can result in denied applications for new privileges, exclusion from insurance networks, increased scrutiny by the Medical Board, and significant damage to your professional reputation — even if the underlying allegations are later proven unfounded or the suspension is eventually lifted. Many physicians discover too late that a single NPDB report can close doors that are extremely difficult to reopen.
A Summary Suspension is an Emergency. Call us at 925-291-5388 for an emergency consultation.
Medical Board of California Implications
When a hospital imposes a summary suspension, the implications for the Medical Board of California are immediate and potentially career-altering. Under Business & Professions Code §805, if the suspension remains in effect for more than 14 days, the hospital is legally required to file an 805 report with the Medical Board within 15 days. This report triggers a formal investigation by the Medical Board’s Enforcement Division, which can lead to a full disciplinary proceeding, including accusations, a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, and possible outcomes ranging from a public reprimand to probation, license suspension, or outright revocation. Even if the hospital later lifts the summary suspension, the initial 805 report often remains on file and can be used as grounds for independent Medical Board action. Many physicians underestimate how aggressively the Medical Board investigates peer review reports — especially summary suspensions — and how quickly a hospital action can snowball into a separate licensing threat that follows you for years.
The Dangers of Resigning While Under Investigation
One of the most common — and often costly — mistakes physicians make when facing a summary suspension or peer review investigation is to resign their hospital privileges in hopes of making the problem “go away.” Under California Business & Professions Code § 805(c), if you resign, take a leave of absence, or abandon your application for privileges after receiving notice of a pending investigation for a medical disciplinary cause or reason, the hospital is required to file an 805 report with the Medical Board of California within 15 days. This resignation is also reportable to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) as a “surrender of clinical privileges while under investigation” or “in lieu of investigation.” The result is a permanent, publicly visible entry that follows you for your entire career — often triggering a separate Medical Board investigation, credentialing denials at other facilities, exclusion from insurance panels, and far greater long-term damage than fighting the original summary suspension. In many cases, staying and aggressively defending your privileges through the hearing process offers a far better path to protecting your license and reputation.
Protect Your Career Under California Law
Summary suspensions are governed by California Business & Professions Code §§ 809 et seq., with the specific authority for immediate action found in § 809.5, which permits a peer review body to suspend or restrict privileges when failure to act “may result in an imminent danger to the health of any individual.”
If the suspension remains in effect for more than 14 days, the hospital must file a report under Business & Professions Code § 805(e) with the Medical Board of California within 15 days, and longer actions trigger federal reporting to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). These statutes, along with the peer review hearing rights outlined in §§ 809.1–809.4 and guidance from the Medical Board of California, create a narrow but critical window for defense.
At the Law Office of Daniel Horowitz, we are one of California’s most experienced and dedicated teams defending physicians in summary suspension and medical staff peer review matters. Our firm has successfully handled numerous high-stakes summary suspension cases across California hospitals, including complex matters at major health systems such as John Muir Health.
We bring a rare combination of legal skill and medical insight to every case: our team includes Dr. Mark Ravis, MD/JD, a practicing physician and licensed California attorney who provides critical clinical perspective, along with seasoned lawyers such as Brookes Hammock who worked for the Medical Board of Ohio and attorney Molly Northrup whose extensive experience with medical issues is combined with an aggressive “can do” approach to tough problems.
Call 925-291-5388 right now for an emergency consultation with a Medical License Defense Lawyer or contact us online.
Client Testimonials
-
There are lawyers and then there are real lawyers. Dan Horowitz is a real lawyer in every since of the word. Dan is a Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. You will not find very many attorneys having such recognition especially one that hits on all cylinders as Dan. In addition to his knowledge of the law and his experience, which I found to be unmatched, i appreciated the fact that he at all times is genuine, which for me says it all. Thank you Dan.Cory N.
-
We have used Mr. Horowitz for over 10 years as our business lawyer. We have never had any problems. He guides us with great wisdom and caring.Albert J.
-
He told me that he hadn't lost a trial in a long time and he didn't want mine to break the streak. I didn't either! We went to trial and he was in control of the courtroom. He was totally prepared. But I was still worried because the prosecutor was very good as well. Daniel was confident but honest. The jury really liked him. As you can tell, he won my case because I am here, writing this review. Thank you.Michael M.
-
He is very tough. He made me listen to him and work his way. He was right. It worked. I won my case and I am very lucky.Avvo Reviewer