Summary of Public Citizen’s Report: Ranking of the Rate of State Medical Boards’ Serious Disciplinary Actions, 2019-2021
Public Citizen (watchdog group) presumed that all states have the same percentage of doctors deserving reporting. They then ranked states with more complaints vs those with less. Here is a summary of the article. What do you think?
Our view is that the depth of inquiry and the expertise used to review cases is the key factor. A numerical approach is specious. But here is in outline form what Public Citizen (a respected outfit) says.
Overview
Source: Public Citizen, published August 16, 2023
Purpose: Evaluates state medical boards’ effectiveness in disciplining physicians for misconduct, incompetence, or illegal behavior from 2019-2021.
Data: National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), focusing on serious disciplinary actions (e.g., license revocations, suspensions, surrenders, restrictions) per 1,000 licensed physicians.
Key Assumption: Physician misconduct rates are uniform across states; differences in disciplinary rates reflect board performance, funding, and enforcement practices.
National Findings:
Michigan led with 1.74 actions per 1,000 physicians, followed by Ohio (1.61), North Dakota (1.60), and Colorado.
Lowest performers: District of Columbia (0.19), Nevada, New Hampshire, and Georgia.
National decline in disciplinary actions compared to 2017-2019.
If all states matched Michigan’s rate, ~1,133 more actions would occur annually, doubling the national total from 1,281 to 2,414.
75% of 9,286 physicians with 5+ malpractice payments since 1990 faced no licensure action.
Recommendations: Increase NPDB use, public access to physician-specific data, more legislative oversight, and better funding for boards.
California-Specific Findings
Ranking: 27th out of 51 (including D.C.), with 0.83 serious disciplinary actions per 1,000 physicians per year.
Context: California has the most licensed physicians but ranks in the lower half, suggesting lax enforcement compared to states like Michigan or New York (7th, 1.25 actions per 1,000).
Limitations: Excludes actions by California’s separate osteopathic board, which licenses ~10% of the state’s physicians.
Implied Issues: Low ranking may stem from inadequate funding, physician-dominated boards, or reactive rather than proactive investigations, though specific causes are not detailed.
Review
Strengths: Clear, data-driven comparison using NPDB data; highlights systemic issues and proposes reforms.
Weaknesses: Limited state-specific analysis (e.g., no explanation of California’s regulatory or funding challenges); exclusion of osteopathic boards may skew results.
Implications for California: Middling rank suggests need for stronger oversight to enhance patient safety, particularly given the state’s large physician population.