Skip to Content
Law Office of Daniel Horowitz Law Office of Daniel Horowitz
Call Us Today! 925-291-5388
Top

Doctors Facing Peer Review have less rights than Criminals

Lady Justice holding the scales of justice
|

MEDICAL DOCTORS HAVE LESS RIGHTS THAN CRIMINALS WHEN THEY FACE PEER REVIEW

Physician Peer Review Defense: Understanding Your Rights (or Lack Thereof) in California

If you are a physician facing peer review or a medical board investigation, you are likely feeling the weight of what feels like a predetermined process. Many doctors describe it the same way: “I’m under peer review” — and the outcome often seems decided long before the hearing begins.

Is Peer Review Truly Fair?

The short answer: No — not in the way most physicians expect.

While the U.S. Constitution guarantees due process rights before depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, those constitutional protections are significantly limited in hospital peer review and medical board proceedings. Courts have repeatedly ruled that private hospitals and medical staffs are not required to provide full constitutional due process. Instead, they must only provide "fair procedure."

This distinction is critical for California physicians. Understanding it can mean the difference between effectively defending your license and career versus watching them slip away.

Key California Case Law on Physician Peer Review Rights

In Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Superior Court (2005) and related decisions, California courts have made clear:

“Since the actions of a private institution are not necessarily those of the state, the controlling concept in such cases is fair procedure and not due process.” — Goodstein v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1257

This means that while you have some procedural rights under California Business & Professions Code § 809 et seq., you do not have the robust constitutional due process protections that criminal defendants receive.

What “Fair Procedure” Actually Means in Peer Review Hearings

The California Supreme Court has addressed the impartiality requirements in peer review panels:

“One of these protections is the right to a hearing before an impartial body.” — Natarajan v. Dignity Health (2021) 11 Cal.5th 1095

However, the practical reality often falls short:

  • The peer review panel is typically selected by the same medical staff or hospital bringing the charges against you.
  • Standards for disqualification of panel members are far less stringent than those applied to judges or arbitrators.
  • Financial conflicts are addressed, but other forms of bias (collegial, competitive, or institutional) are much harder to successfully challenge.

Physicians frequently discover too late that the deck is stacked against them in these proceedings.

Protecting Your Medical License and Career

Peer review actions can lead to:

  • Adverse reports to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB)
  • Medical Board of California investigations
  • Loss of hospital privileges
  • Damage to your professional reputation

You need experienced legal representation before the first hearing date.

At the Horowitz Law Group, we focus exclusively on defending physicians in peer review hearings, medical board disciplinary actions, and medical fraud investigations throughout California.

Daniel Horowitz has decades of experience fighting for doctors’ rights when their careers and reputations are on the line. We understand both the medicine and the law — and how to strategically navigate these uniquely challenging proceedings.

For assistance call Daniel Horowitz at (925) 291-5388

For more on this subject read our blog - Do Physicians in Peer Review Hearings Have Due Process Rights?