Skip to Content

CHAT GPT – Does it Work for Legal Questions ?


I was in Magistrate Spero’s court listening to a discussion about whether and how late in the case plaintiff’s counsel can amend the complaint. I heard what Magistrate Spero said. Then I put the question into Chat GPT. Here is what it said.

In the United States federal court system, the rules regarding the amendment of a civil complaint are primarily governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). Specifically, Rule 15 of the FRCP addresses the issue of amending pleadings.

Under Rule 15(a)(1), a plaintiff has the right to amend their complaint once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving it or within 21 days after a responsive pleading or a motion to dismiss is filed, whichever is earlier. This means that a plaintiff can typically amend their complaint without seeking permission from the court or obtaining consent from the opposing party within this initial 21-day period.

After the initial period has passed or if the plaintiff has already amended the complaint once, Rule 15(a)(2) allows for further amendments with either the consent of the opposing party or by obtaining permission from the court. The rule states that “a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires.”

The phrase “when justice so requires” gives the court discretion to determine whether to grant permission for amendment. Courts generally consider factors such as undue delay, prejudice to the opposing party, futility of the proposed amendment, and the overall interests of justice when deciding whether to allow further amendments.

While there is no specific deadline mentioned in the rule for seeking permission to amend, it is generally advisable for a plaintiff to request leave to amend as soon as they become aware of the need for the amendment. Delaying the request could potentially harm the plaintiff’s chances of obtaining permission, especially if it causes undue prejudice to the opposing party or significantly delays the progress of the case.

It’s important to note that individual judges may interpret and apply the rules differently, so it’s always a good idea to consult the local rules of the specific federal district court where the case is being heard, as well as any relevant case law or guidance provided by the court.

In my humble opinion this answer is spot on !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The post CHAT GPT – Does it Work for Legal Questions ? appeared first on Lawyers In Lafayette.

Share To: