
MEC Investigations
The Best MEC Legal Defense Team
The Horowitz Physician Defense Law Group, led by renowned attorney Daniel Horowitz, specializes in defending physicians facing hospital Medical Executive Committee (MEC) investigations and inquiries. Known for his unparalleled trial expertise, proven negotiation skills, and groundbreaking appellate victories, Daniel Horowitz has built a reputation as one of the top medical defense attorneys.
RISKS OF AN MEC INVESTIGATION
MEC investigations pose a significant risk to physicians' licenses and their ability to practice medicine. Once an investigation is initiated, it becomes exceedingly uncommon for the physician to avoid sanctions.
PIP's & Lesser Discipline
Measures like Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs), counseling, coaching, and warnings may appear to be collaborative but they are often precursors to more serious challenges targeting the medical licensee.
Resignation Under Investigation
Once an investigation is disclosed to you a resignation (under investigation) is reportable to the National Practitioner Data Bank and most medical boards.
Rumors & Undercutting
Investigations are like blood in the water. Weakness attracts more detractors and supporters will hide in fear. A strong and rapid response is needed to stop rumors and to discourage undercutting of the target doctor.
Legal Representation is Necessary
Physicians should seek legal representation as soon as there is any indication of an MEC investigation and before agreeing to a PIP or other interim discipline. Importantly, requests for explanations or in-person meetings with the Committee rarely result in full exoneration for the physician under scrutiny. Legal representation before such interviews is critically important.
Remember - When the MEC is investigating - Time is Not Your Friend.
EARLY MEC INVESTIGATION
Daniel Horowitz emphasizes, “They have attorneys—so should you.” When a Medical Executive Committee (MEC) investigation begins, the committee typically consults legal counsel before approaching the physician under scrutiny.
Relying on self-help during an MEC investigation is rarely effective. Critical timelines for summary suspensions, committee interviews, and the start of formal proceedings are often very short. Once disciplinary actions are taken, they are challenging to reverse, leaving the physician responsible for overcoming significant obstacles to restore their reputation.
At the Horowitz Physician Defense Law Group, our medical defense experts provide strategic guidance, either discreetly behind the scenes or, when necessary, through formal representation to protect your rights and career."
Powers of the Medical Executive Committee (MEC)
Role and Authority
"Delegation of Power: The Organized Medical Staff grants substantial authority to the Medical Executive Committee (MEC). While this local committee may appear to lack strict formality or consistent structure, its exercise of power can be disproportionately strong and authoritative. Informal contacts, seemingly innocent sidebars can quickly turn formal when you are summoned to meet with the executive committee.
While technically separate, the MEC may in practice act as an extension of the hospital’s executive branch, often prioritizing business-driven decisions over clinical independence. For optimal governance, hospitals should maintain an independent medical staff and MEC. In practice the MEC is often part medically drive and part politically and economically driven.
Scope of Influence: The MEC holds significant responsibilities, including reviewing medical staff qualifications, approving new procedures and equipment, and overseeing initial credentialing and scope of privilege applications. This influential body is governed by both state and federal laws and must adhere to compliant by-laws." It makes recommendations to the governing body (board of directors) and interacts with the board most directly through the Chief Medical officer (who may or may not have medical staff privileges).
What is a Medical Executive Committee (MEC)
Primary Responsibilities
Patient Safety: The MEC prioritizes patient safety and collaborates closely with executive management to enhance the hospital’s health and profitability.
Ultimate Authority: The hospital’s governing body, typically the board of directors, holds ultimate authority and responsibility. However, many boards focus more on donations and personal benefits rather than active governance.
Investigative and Disciplinary Functions
Performance and Conduct Issues: When issues such as performance failures, medical errors, or behavioral problems arise, the MEC steps in. Investigations can be informal or formal, often lacking strict adherence to fair investigation or hearing rules.
Impact on Physicians: Physicians are highly vulnerable during MEC investigations due to two main reasons:
- Summary Suspension: The MEC can initiate a summary suspension.
- Discipline or Remediation: The MEC can recommend disciplinary actions or remediation, leaving the cumbersome peer review process as the physician’s only recourse for justice.
MEC investigations can be informal or formal. You will benefit by retaining a peer review lawyer at the earliest sign of an investigation. The best MEC lawyers focus their practice on medical license and privilege law.
You can trust the expertise of the Horowitz Medical Law Group. Led by Daniel Horowitz, recognized as the best lawyer for medical peer review cases, our team ensures that your rights are protected and that you receive fair treatment throughout the process.
What is a Medical Executive Committee
MEC Protections from a Lawsuit
Legal Protections for the MEC in California
The Medical Executive Committee (MEC) is largely protected from lawsuits related to its conduct. The “Peer Review” process is typically shielded by the California anti-SLAPP statute which means that any lawsuit against the MEC for peer review matters must be meticulously crafted. If the lawsuit is not properly written, or if an unfavorable judge reviews the case, the doctor’s case can be dismissed, and the judge may impose substantial attorney’s fees on the losing doctor.
Choose Your Peers Carefully
Physicians forming partnerships and obtaining hospital privileges are usually people in love. When they come to the Horowitz law office, they are usually out of love and getting a divorce. When you are in the love stage try to force yourself to do a hard evaluation of the composition and day to day function of your particular MEC. What is the agenda of Medical Staff and who is really in charge? If you smell a skunk don't be fooled if they bring you roses.
Dangers from Former “Friends” in Medical Practice
Peer review, summary suspensions, and resignations while under investigation are all triggers for license harms, primarily due to medical board reporting and National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) reporting. License and credentialing disclosures must include these peer review-imposed sanctions, which must be explained throughout a physician’s career. Great care must be taken, as even lesser restrictions, such as performance improvement plans (PIPs), can trigger reporting if a physician resigns during the existence of a PIP.
Your peers can quickly become your persecutors, and their conduct can easily trigger state and federal protections that grant them governmental-type powers. When you sign on with a medical group or hospital, remember that you are empowering them in case of a conflict.


New Definition as to “When” a Peer Review Investigation has Commenced
A recent development is a broadening as to when an investigation is deemed to have commenced. This can effect many rights and trigger a myriad of protections to the instigating parties.
Recently the concept of resignation under investigation received attention when a California Court greatly broadened the concept of an MEC investigation. In (Wisner v. Dignity Health (2022) 85 Cal.App.5th 35 [300 Cal.Rptr.3d 359, 370, 85 Cal.App.5th 35]) the court relied upon the NPDB Guidebook (National Practitioner Data Bank Guidebook) for determining what was or was not an “investigation”.
The court stated that “[w]e agree with the NPDB Guidebook that the definition of an investigation cannot be controlled by a hospital’s bylaws, policies, or procedures.” Until this ruling, many physician lawyers relied upon the by-laws to determine this issue of law. It made sense. The by-laws govern MEC actions and review. The by-law definitions should apply to define the term “investigation”.
Client Testimonials
-
Dan Horowitz was the best attorney I could have asked for during a difficult time in my career. From the moment I met him, I felt believed, respected, and safe. He and his team were endlessly responsive and empathetic to me and my family. He fought for my case day and night, always keeping my best interests at the forefront of his mind. As I learned from Dan, it is never a good time in one’s life to need legal representation - but if you need it, Dan is your person, your advocate, and your best friend. We are forever grateful for his tireless commitment to justice for the people.Katherine
-
He is approachable but serious. Mr. Horowitz is the perfect balance of what someone wants in a lawyer. Not only is he approachable enough to gain and value your trust, but he's a bulldog in the courtroom. Despite his kindness, I have never once doubted his ability to provide me with THE BEST representation in court. I'm so thankful to have found a lawyer capable of such a delicate balancing act.Molly A.
-
My experience with Dan was great. I appreciate the knowledge Dan has and the professionalism they exhibit. I would highly recommend the Law Office Of Daniel Horowitz. My family and I are truly grateful we worked with him.Brandon D.
-
I can not say enough about Mr. Horowitz and his staff. Brook was amazing to myself and my family. My case was very unique. He believed in me and listened to what I had to say. I highly recommend him and his staff. Yvett BlineYvett Bline
